Notes of Press Freedom Lecture of March 13, 2001

British Origin of Singapore Laws

2nd Charter of Justice 1826

l  Introduced English law as at 27 Nov. 1826

l  Set up court system

l  Clarified by the Privy Council (the highest court) in Yeap Cheah Neo v Ong Cheng Neo (1875) L.R. 6 P.C. 381 at 394, to mean “statutes relating to matters and exigencies peculiar to the local condition of England, and which are not adapted to the circumstances of a particular Colony, do not become a part of its law, although the general law of England may be introduced into it.”

The Singapore Court System

Subordinate Court (currently at Havelock Road)

l  Magistrate Court

l  District Court

Supreme Court (City Hall)

l  High Court

l  Court of Appeal

Choice of forum depends on penalty/amount of damages sought

Sources of Law I

1. Constitution

l  It is a law empowering other laws

l  Carries no penalties, only striking out laws

2. Statutes

l  Includes subsidiary legislation

3. Common Law

l  “Unwritten” judge-made law

l   Especially important in defamation

Sources of Law II

4. Law of Equity

l  Mitigates harshness of law

l  Common sense notions of fairness

5. Administrative Rules

6. Custom

l  Practice in a country, eg rules of the road

7. Industry Practice

l  Practice in an industry, eg travel

What Is Freedom Of Speech

It’s Freedom To Express

·     Opinion

·     Commentary

·     Facts

What Is Press Freedom

1. No government intervention through censorship and other similar restraints, and

2. Any restriction must be applied by or reviewed through the courts and only the courts have the power to impose penalties.

In practice, press/media freedom must also include freedom of access to the media: to create media companies, to distribute media products and the freedom to read.

You need both Political and Financial independence.

UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (10 Dec 1948)

Article 19
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;  this right includes freedom to hold opinions without  interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Question:
How Realistic Is the UN UDHR’s Article 19?

UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (10 Dec 1948)

Article 19
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;  this right includes freedom to hold opinions without  interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

1966 UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights interpreting Article 19:

“the exercise of (freedom of expression) carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be  subject to certain restrictions . . . :
--For respect of the rights or reputations of others
--For the protection of national security, or of public order, or of public health or [public] morals.”

1993 Report by Special Rapporteur Of UNCHR

Report reinforced 1966 interpretation.

Article 10 of the European Convention on  Human Rights by Council of Europe (1950)

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This  right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.

 

  (2) The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of public health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

Press Freedom in ASEAN

All ASEAN states have freedom of the press clauses in their constitutions

US: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech or of the press.”

Philippines: “No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.”

But newsprint is controlled.

Thailand: Restrictions to preserve “good order”

The King is revered.

Freedom of the press is in the context of a national goal.

Indonesia (old): Foreign news agencies must disseminate news through national news agencies. 

    News media must be owned by nationals.

National ideology--pancasila

Control on: number of pages; news-ad ratio; import of newsprint; Directives by military on treatment of stories

New situation--ownership must be 100% Indonesian; otherwise many things go

Malaysia: May discuss but can't question fairness of racial discrimination. (In constitution.) Press freedom has worsened after the Anwar episode.

Free Speech in Singapore

Part IV Fundamental Liberties

Article 9 Liberty of the Person

Article 10 Slavery and Forced Labor Prohibited

Article 11 Protection Against Retrospective Criminal Laws and Repeated Trials

Article 12 Equality

Article 13 Prohibition of Banishment and Freedom of Movement

Article 14 Freedom of Speech, Assembly, and Association

Article 15 Freedom of Religion

Article 16 Rights in Respect of Education

What are the differences between the previous free-speech clauses and Singapore’s free-speech clause in Article 14?

 

Article 14 Freedom of Speech, Assembly, and Association

(1) Subject to clauses (2) and (3)
(a) every citizen of Singapore has the right to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) all citizens of Singapore have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; and
(c) all citizens of Singapore have the right to form associations.

(2) Parliament may by law impose
(a) on the rights conferred by clause (1)(a), such restrictions as it considers necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of Singapore or any part thereof, friendly relations with other countries, public order or morality and restrictions designed to protect the privileges of Parliament or to provide against contempt of court, defamation or incitement to any offence;

(b) on the rights conferred by clause (1)(b),...

(c) on the rights conferred by clause (1)(c),...